Minutes of Friends of Regents Canal Meeting 8th October 2003 Camley Street Chair - Andrew Bedford. Present: Ryan Kemp, Copenhagen Neighbourhood Forum Bill Thomas, Diespeker Wharf Seymour Laxon, Resident Thornhill Bridge Wharf Fiona Strawbridge, Resident Thornhill Bridge Wharf Fiona MacLean, London Narrow Boat Assn Iain Mactavish, London Narrow Boat Assn Clair Butler, London Narrow Boat Assn Mike Manuel, British waterways London Jon Guest, British Waterways London Steve Dixon, Groundwork Camden & Islington Marcus Jones, Camden Canal & Narrow boat Association. Regents Network James Bill, Regent Network Richard Kirby, L.B Camden Kings X Team Del Brenner, Regents Network Jim Langdon, Angel Canal Festival Richard Shaw, L.B Islington David Graham, MontaguEvans Parabola Land Paul Dimoldenburg, Co-ord Relations/Parabola Land Francis Chronnell, Islington Boat Club Chris Ashby, Islington Cyclists Action Group Stephan Schulte, York Central Residents Assn Colin Wills, Police Community Support Officer Mohammad Ahsan, Police Community Support Officer Mark Warwick, Police Jeremy Pudney, Islington Boat Club Lisa Tang, Treaty Street Residents Assn Louisa Roscoe, Nature Conservation Warden (minutes) Andrew Bedford, Ecology Manager (chair). Apologies: Mick Coady, Greenspace Ranger 1.Welcome & Introductions 2. Kings Cross Redevelopment: feedback from pre-meeting (Separate report on pre-meeting available) Discussion followed: L.B Camden encouraged all to respond individually as well as a group. Deadline for input = 10th November 03. Concern raised about Camden allowing increase in height of buildings & not protecting viewing corridors. Reassured that viewing corridor will not be affected. Islington Planning brief only covers Islington triangle. Brief is on their website; consultation period is briefer. 3. Gate Locking Trial Three month trial period of gates unlocked recently completed on east side of canal from Vincent Terrace to Sturt's Lock. Feedback from residents has been mixed: some residents opposite City Road Lock raised the issue of increased noise; another resident reported noise had lessened as people no longer climbing over gates. Reported incidents of crime have been minimal. Conclusions: security of property is owner's responsibility; noise does have impact, but there are other means to deal with this. Gates to remain unlocked. West side from Muriel Street to York Way: Andrew Bedford to recommend 3 month trial opening. This will exclude Treaty St. gate as this is used as a crime getaway route, and York Way and other entrances are near as alternative exits for users of canal. Boating community supports gates being open. 4. Security on the Canal Concern raised re fireworks; police are doing some late patrolling & will be giving mobile no. out. Difficulties in tackling firework use as people disperse immediately. Particular spot on Cally Rd is being monitored by police. & police also targeting suppliers. Cycle patrols have been effective elsewhere. Police want feedback about where main areas of concern they need to focus on. Will liase with Camden. Non-urgent concerns can be reported by e-mail (include specific details): mark.warwick@met.police.uk Discussion on different security measures: signs saying "This Park is Patrolled"; CCTV. Reality regarding patrols is that police resources are very limited so policing is primarily intelligence-led, though community police officers do patrol. Cameras only useful if staffed & unlikely to have funds for this; this could be included in Kings X Development plan. Issue of simply displacing problem, e.g. increase of sex workers in Islington having moved from Camden after Operation Whelan disbanded. 5. Cycling on the canal Brief discussion on how to slow down cyclists in specific problem spots. 6. 96 York Way Development Discussion with developers re proposal of office scheme & private arts centre. Planning application was made to L..B.I last week. Developers wanting feedback from Friends Group on: a) opportunities to provide mooring facilities b) opening up of access to basin on south side Meeting's main concern was building proposed is seven storeys, with main height being specifically on the canal side. Developers have addressed this issue but failed to find other options that didn't affect other areas; in order to fund arts project, require certain amount of office space to let. Point raised that no other buildings in the area are this height, will set a precedent; why isn't arts centre being incorporated in Kings X Redevelopment instead? (e.g. use of old gas-ometers). No one against development of this site, it is the height that is the issue. Developers concerned to reassure everyone that their client is committed to running successful arts centre; green credentials of the building i.e. using air conditioning system that has lower emissions, means each floor to ceiling space has to be larger than in usual buildings. Discussion on moorings: different opinions, some concern that not enough width for on-line moorings, suggestion put out of the way in the basin because of damage from wide-beamed commercial craft (some disagreement on this point); there is scarcity of visitors moorings & secure overnight moorings needed, public access may make it unsuitable site? Others thought access to café & arts centre would attract some boats. Water bus a possibility? 7. City Road Basin Richard Shaw, L.B.I explained master plan exercise & development policy being formed. Draft document will be available for six-week consultation period within next 3 weeks. Some concern that public views will actually be taken into account & the document is not a fait accompli. Design principles are in place i.e. public access around the basin, & the quality of the environment & greenspace. Point raised that there has been no public consultation since 2000, but developers & architects etc have had an enormous amount of consultation. Concern that park will go; this has previously been raised, possibility for proposal to take this into account from start? Consultation is from end October to first week December. Friends to have specific meeting during this time for draft to be presented, & group to have opportunity to respond. Important to see plans before meeting if possible. Andrew to set date for meeting in November & inform everyone. 8. Project Updates a) Groundwork: presented Mural Project for views. Project initially came out of consultation with young people from All Saints area. Proposal is for mural to be designed by young people in conjunction with professional artist; historical aspect of area is theme. Funding is in place. One proposed site for finished work is Thornhill Bridge West. (Maiden Lane Bridge considered, but turned down by Islington Planning Dept, although passed by Camden.) Would be mounted on boards so as not to damage brickwork, also to allow being movable. Discussion: timescale requested for how long mural in place so that not automatically a permanent fixture; pigeons may need to be netted off; benefits of engaging young people in art projects & involving them in the canal to be balanced against too many art projects that are inappropriate; on previous sites, projects like this have reduced graffiti & brightened up bridges. Generally positive feeling from the group for this project. Further feedback to: steve.dixon@groundwork.org.uk b) All Saints Garden: funding is through for wrought iron gate to be made by Freeform Arts & designed by local artist; also for mosaic to be made for wall of church overlooking garden and working with local schools. c) Treaty Street Project: Workday planned for 6th November to install window boxes, plant raised beds & inlay mosaic pavings that have been designed with children from Copenhagen School. d) Angel Canal Festival: 18th Festival went very well; lots of input from British Waterways & community involvement. Organisation is voluntary & raises own funds; would appreciate some practical help from Friends Group. Short report will be circulated next meeting. Item carried forward: Biodiversity Action Plan

Minutes of Friends of Regents Canal meeting 1/9/04 Diespeker Wharf, 38 Graham St, N1 Chair - Andrew Bedford. Attendance Amanda Peck LBI Planning Chris Ashby ICAG Del Brenner Regents Network Gordon Meen F of RC Camden Leo Chapman EC1 New Deal Lisa Tang TSRA Andrew Beharrell PTE architects Sally Sheider Islington Boat Club Mike Manuel BWL Ryan Kemp Copenhagen Neighbourhood Paul Vivian LB Camden Kings X Team Eric Sorenson Angel Association Andrew Bedford Greenspace Ecology Manager (chair) Louisa Roscoe Nature Conservation Warden (minutes) Apologies Marcus Jones,Regents Network James Bill, Regents Network Lucy Edwards, Greenspace Ranger Jim Lagden, ACF Mark Hammil, LBI Planning 1. Welcome & introductions 2. Minutes of last meeting a) Thornhill Bridge Community Gardens: successful launch of new mosaic on 15/7/04, attended by press, Mayor of Islington, pupils of Elizabeth Garrett Anderson School & some members of F of RC. Regular community workdays are taking place; still need more members. People's Places Project is due to take place beginning of November: community Nature Conservation Project, developing section of the bank between towpath and top Muriel St path. b) Portal over bridge by Muriel St: BW has put up temporary fence on parapet wall to prevent people climbing down to private moorings; NCT & English Heritage to be consulted regarding permanent changes. c) BW Users Group: request for more info [Info supplied post-meeting by Mike Manuel: next meeting for East is on 12th Oct & West is on 19th Oct, venues to be confirmed. 150 people are invited representing a range of organisations.] d) Query re Richard Shaw's response stating building heights SPG is totally consistent with master plan. e) Clarify that group wants councillors at Fof RC meetings to hear views; some disappointment expressed that councillors don't attend v. often. Action: Andrew to send separate e-mail to ward councillors. f) Day of meeting: request for last Wednesday of the month 3. City Road Basin & Packington Estate Presentation by Amanda Peck, LBI Planning: a) Packington Estate Last year it was confirmed buildings don't comply with building regs. Estate has now been made safe, gas cookers replaced by elec. Housing Dept has been working closely with residents. Residents Reference Group (independent & well-advised) had 3 options to consider for redevelopment & choice between housing assoc. or private. Planning Dept will develop brief which will identify key issues. Draft for 25th Oct for S. Area Cttee. Will have increase in no. of dwellings; currently is quite low density, Mayor of London will push for higher density. (Original street pattern map & planning brief site plan handed out to meeting.) Open space: the park along the canal - residents are keen to move fast & see this area as possible site for initial devel. Property facing canal will be prime for private market. LBI considering putting in new canal basin, but tenure mix means it's probably not feasible. Council, private & shared-ownership dwellings will be prescribed to all look consistent as an estate. Residents want 2-storey terraced housing. Will be a loss of 60 affordable housing units. Residents have to decide if they stay while redevelopment happens around them or if move out, & then might have choice to permanently move out. F of RC's concern & input is re the canal: canal is open space and needs to be regarded as this; dislike of canal being seen only as opportunity for raising housing prices, it is a water-thorough fare & public facility & needs to be respected as such. b) City Rd Basin (Amanda has taken over from Richard Shaw) Since last meeting: master plan has been adopted; developers are writing application for 2 towers. Planning application for fidelity site is in; access storage plan is on its way. SPG on tall buildings hasn't been adopted yet & is contrary to UDP. There's guidance at different stages. View expressed by member of group: if thorough environmental impact assessment were to be done on fidelity site, it would fail. Will be a document; Andrew will flag up via e-mail. Re-opening station has been looked into, but costs too high according to Transport Planner; meeting asked for more info on this. Section 106: lot of public interest in this, how is it going to be publicised? Broad heads of terms are in master plan. Amanda to get back to group re this. 4. Kings Place (Mark Hammill not avail, Amanda presenting on his behalf) Application approved on 1/7/04 subject to Section 106. Section 106 officer now talking to relevant parties: Zayd Al-jawad 020 7527 2564 £475000 between Battlebridge & Tiber Gdns. Andrew has met with Mary Norden (BW Ecologist) to plan establishment of canal marginal vegetation; not going to be able to establish aquatic vegetation because of overshadowing. Regents Network has had correspondence with local MPs re GLA - has consent been issued? 'Right to light issue' for residents was raised. Planning will regularly attend these meetings. 5. Kings X Central Intro from Lisa Tang: planning application submitted in June; last year Fof RC responded to draft consultation doc. Presentation from Paul Vivian, Planner LB Camden Kings X team: (Final published brief distributed to meeting & timetable re consultation process; also collation of all aspects of application relating to the canal) Consultation process is extended to 8th Oct. BW has had response from Camden re the issues they have raised. Discussion about proposed new bridge to provide pedestrian/cycle link; is it going to be public or private? Camley St have opposed bridge here - wanting to know about impact on wildlife in terms of height of bridge, open at night etc. Camden want good east to west link. Area doesn't feel desirable for pedestrians & cyclists; other improvements needed. Want continuous green corridor, this has impact on Islington. Overshadowing could be from Kings Place all the way along. This could instead be an opportunity to extend Camley St., but ruled out because LWT didn't want to manage it & development is competing for the site. Fof RC would like to see this area as habitat. South of Goods Way plan for buildings of 12 storeys where current petrol station is on York Way (now building of 7 or 8 storeys). Argent St George saying this is no problem, Camden consulting re impact of shade. Proposed 15% of Green roofs on development: Argent have kept this in their application. Proposal to have sub-group to look at planning issues in more detail. Lisa to make formal response from this group & e-mail it to Andrew. Application is available on Camden's website & at Camden & Islington town Halls. If want CD sent out, contact: paul.vivian@camden.gov.uk Thanks to Paul for attending meeting. 6. Thanks to Pollard Thomas & Edwards for wonderful hospitality provided for our meetings. 7. Date of next Meeting: Wednesday 24th November 7 - 9pm Venue to be decided

Friends of Regents Canal (Islington) Minutes of Meeting 25th May 2005 Diespeker Wharf, 38 Graham Street, N1 Chair - Andrew Bedford. Attendance Del Brenner Regents Network/Mayors Thames and Waterways Steering Group Stephen Fisher Pollard, Thomas & Edwards Architects Adrian Judd Whitelaw Turkington Richard Warwick Bennetts Associates Amanda Peck LBI Planning Lisa Tang Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners Stephanie Hinde Groundwork Camden & Islington Ricky Wright LBI Waste Enforcement Officer Malcolm Cree LBI Waste Enforcement Officer Frances Balfour Islington Society & resident Jim Lagden Angel Canal Festival/ Islington Canal Museum Beryl Windsor Angel Canal Festival John Cohen Resident Chris Ashby Islington Cyclists' Action Group Leo Chapman EC1 New Deal Ryan Kemp Copenhagen Forum Gordon Meen Camden Friends of Regents Canal John MacGowan Angel Association Eric Sorensen Angel Association Mike Manuel British Waterways Andrew Bedford LBI Ecology Manager (chair) Louisa Roscoe LBI Nature Conservation Warden (minutes) Apologies Jon Guest, British Waterways Fiona MacLean, London Narrow Boat Association 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Matters arising from minutes of last meeting 2:2:2e) Andrew still to e-mail Councillors Action 2:2:6) Residents feeling BW is being unhelpful regarding moorings issues. Action Mike Manuel to take resident's details & will get Phil Bittner (BW Moorings Officer) to call asap. Phillip.Bittner@britishwaterways.co.uk 2:3a) Following Treaty Street consultation, the gates are now unlocked 2:3b) Danbury St gate: problems seem resolved, no further complaints. 2:5) Kings X Central: revised application is due in approx. 3 months. Kings X Forum is making significant input. The canal is being sidelined, so they plan another meeting to focus attention specifically on the canal. The details will be circulated to FofRC. BW has been meeting with Argent & expressed their concerns regarding the loss of basins & the locations of bridges. They are working with Camden. Request for Kings X Central to be on agenda of next FofRC meeting. Action 2:6) Packington Estate: residents are not happy with the masterplan. It has not been adopted by LBI. It will be used initially to get quotes from Housing Associations; they will be aware it is contentious. 4. Dog Fouling Presentation from Malcolm Cree of LBI's Enforcement Team whose remit covers dog fouling, graffiti, fly-tipping etc: New officers will be attached to Greenspace & will include the Regents Canal. Officers can issue tickets if they directly witness dog fouling; they do enforce the byelaws and make the owner pick up the fouling themselves. The Team will target an area if requested by residents. They can give 100 bags to a dog owner initially; owners are then required to purchase any more. They work in conjunction with the Community Police and will have new powers from July as a result of the Safe Neighbourhood Bill. They can hold people if they believe they are not giving correct name & address. The team has been remiss in not working with FofRC before, but have more resources now. They rely on info from canal users & members of the public. Presentation from Stephanie Hinde from Groundwork: Have carried out awareness-raising projects with schools, however no longer have a full post on the Regents Canal. They have £10

Friends of Regents Canal (Islington) Minutes of the 27th September 2006 meeting held at Pollard Thomas and Edwards, Diespeker Wharf, 38 Graham Street, N1. Chair - Andrew Bedford. Attendance: Ryan Kemp, Copenhagen Forum / Local Resident Lynn Hebblethwaite, LBI Greenspace Ranger Frances Welan, Local Resident Del Brenner, Regents Network / London Waterways Commission Jim Lagden, Angel Canal Festival Ruth Hargeaves, TBCG / Local Resident Edna Wilson, TBCG / Local Resident Urvisha Mistry, Groundwork Des Spellman, Local Resident Stephen Fisher, Pollard Thomas and Edwards Gordon Meenn, Reachview Residents and FORC (Camden) Jon Guest, British Waterways Andrew Bedford (Chair), LBI Ecology and Ranger Manager Chris Ashby (Minutes). Islington Cyclists Action Group 1. Welcome and introductions: Round table introductions took place and an attendance sheet was filled in. 2. Apologies: Francis Chronnell, Beryl Windsor, Lisa Tang, Amanda Peck, Louise Fishleigh, Louisa Roscoe, Jeremy Pudney, Leo Chapman. 3. Matters Arising from minutes of last meeting: 3.2.2.4. Dog fouling: Andrew explained that new legislation is now operating and the towpath will now be "dogs on lead". Resources and means are available to enforce this initiative that will cover the west side of the Islington Tunnel, one of the eight hotspots. 3.3. It was reported that Howard Piper may get involved in this group in future but is also liasing with British Waterways regarding his proposal for a green corridor / park. 4. Structure of group - review of proposals: Andrew and Louisa had circulated a paper "Structure and Format of Friends of Regents Canal (Islington)" from the discussion held at our meeting on 7.6.06. The paper outlined three options and included suggestions for two sub groups that could be adopted alongside these options. If you missed this paper, it can be obtained from Andrew and Louisa. The following points were made in discussion: Del: Our group works ok at present but has a major weakness in that we don't have much clout. If FORC had a constitution it would have more direction and more influence. FORC doesn't currently involve enough local groups, especially residents' groups. It would be useful to have membership of the group. Ryan: It would be beneficial to involve local councillors. They are keen to get involved, but currently they are at the Labour Party conference. It's important to publicise the group more widely and to get more of the people who use and love the canal involved and this is the main thing to work on. Jon: The group must be small enough to be manageable and preferably consist of those who live close to the canal and who use it. Jim passed round a paper that he'd produced for the discussion. It looked at the areas covered by the canal and concluded that FORC should focus on the waterside buildings, land and streets east of the tunnel to Sturts Lock. The paper considered the types of people who might get involved, what we want the area to be and do and what any structure needs to do. Jim concluded by suggesting an Option 4 that would be set up like a trust. This could generate a large and subscribing membership from which would emerge an active volunteer force. Andrew: We should examine the two suggested sub groups to see if we think they're relevant to incorporate within our structure. Stephen: The objectives of the group are more important than the structure. People can already get involved if they wish. Ryan: It was important to have the option of arranging special meetings to tackle, for example, proposed and ongoing planning developments that affect the canal, as well as and in addition to our main meetings. Del: The group's catchment area should cover the environs of the canal as it passes through Islington but should also include the parts of Hackney within these boundaries. The only limit for peoples' involvement would be whether they felt affected by waterway issues. Ruth: We should consider broadening our remit to include the relevant parts of Camden and Hackney, although this might be best done using sub-groups. Gordon: Option 3 is like Camden FORC used to be. Jon: There could be a Friends group for the whole canal with sub groups for each borough. Andrew: If another organisation took over the administration there would be a cost. For instance, Groundwork Camden and Islington would be likely to charge £3,600 pa to run Option 3. Ryan: Local concerns are the most important for the group to consider. Des: FORC should consider advertising itself. We should have a logo and meetings should be well publicised. We might consider setting up a credit union to get more people involved. Jim: Many people believe that canals are important and it's those usually local people who we should target for involvement in our group. Chris: We have discussed the role and administration of FORC before and we overwhelmingly decided then to stay as we are with LBI Greenspace continuing to do the administration. This was because we believed the group worked fairly well, was able to get officers and developers to attend as well as reasonable numbers of people who cared about the canal, many of them local. We felt that FORC did have some influence with decision makers. We should therefore continue to stay as we are but always be open to self -examination to see if we can improve what we do. Edna: Suggested we drop Islington from the title as people will attend if they're interested. Del: In addition to our usual business meetings, we should convene meetings with invited speakers, because many people don't like attending meetings but do want to learn more about the canal. Chris: We should be realistic about the resources that FORC is able to draw upon and keep things as simple as possible. It would be much too time consuming to take on fundraising, for example. Andrew summarised this wide-ranging and useful discussion as follows: Option 3 was ruled out for the time being. It might be possible to merge aspects of Options 1 and 2. FORC is unique as a Friends group in the borough. Rotating the position of Chair is a possibility. We should take another look at the purpose and objectives of the group and consider setting up appropriate sub-groups and people are welcome to email their ideas on this. There were some volunteers for a planning sub-group but officers would need to be involved. There were also some volunteers for a "Social" sub group. The main meetings should include reports on the work of the sub groups. In conclusion we should stay as we are but develop as we see fit. 5. Reports back: Angel Canal Festival: Jim reported that this year's festival was again extremely successful with over 80 stalls and many other attractions. This safe, secure and enjoyable event is both good for the canal and good for Islington and well worth its £15K budget. And it has never been rained off! Del stated that this is the best local canal festival around. City Road Basin: Andrew reported that 600 fliers had been distributed to local residents and stakeholders with 30 responses received so far. A drop-in session at the park and at the festival had been arranged. The deadline for comments had passed but any further comments would be welcomed. Andrew agreed to email this information when available. Towpath Liaison Group - BW Safety Audit: Louisa attended on behalf of Greenspace; no representative from FofRC came forward, but good representation from Islington at the meeting. Presentation of report by Transport Initiatives, commissioned by BW. 6 locations chosen - Islington section is Danbury St to Wharf Rd. Observations were carried out at peak times in a.m's & p.m's and at weekend. Total of 58hours observation over all locations; Islington 8 hours. Analysis of 'interactions' (minor) 'conflicts' (serious) & 'collisions'. Interactions made up 89% of total events recorded. For Islington: 48 interactions; 5 conflicts; 2 collisions. Peak trouble spots: Wharf Rd Bridge accounted for 14% of all recorded events of entire study, due to narrow width under bridge & lack of visibility in both directions. Danbury St access next main problem spot due to step onto towpath at base of slope & directional confusion for public. NB Statistics of report showed majority of events as minor (i.e. where pedestrians & cyclists avoided each other, sometimes unconsciously). This was challenged by 2 reps for Islington - William Owen, Hanover School & Howard Piper, Angel Association. Both also thought the number of cyclists recorded for Islington was an underestimate. Also that report does not recognise that a number of people have stopped using the towpath because of safety/cyclists. Outcomes & proposals: Infrastructure: main emphasis on widening towpath where possible; improving sightlines by cutting back vegetation; resurfacing areas; railings; silvering under bridges. Educational: better & consistent signage; code of conduct; rangers on bikes - one each side of the tunnel, cross-borough; keep left campaign; 'two-ting' bell use TfL will look at road networks adjacent to towpath with view to improvements to encourage commuter cyclists to use these. BW's timetable for whole area: TfL money to be spent by 31st Mar 07 Sept & Oct - liaise re proposals Nov - contractor procured Dec - Feb - works on site (Works will be vegetation clearance, removal of conflicting signage, installation of railings & other surfacing repairs & improvements.) March - public awareness strategy Louisa raised point of canal being Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation. BW have made commitment to consult re ecological value of areas where vegetation clearance & towpath widening has been proposed. Fof RC was not represented at last meeting. If they want to be, need to elect rep at this meeting. Rep to contact Louise Fishleigh, BW Recreation Manager: Tel 020 7985 7234 Louise.Fishleigh@britishwaterways.co.uk (rep not elected) BW also wants to know general views on 'keep left' proposals FORC agreed that alternative commuter cycling routes to the canal should be better promoted. 6. Groundwork: Urvisha informed us that Groundwork are preparing to work on access improvements to the west side of the canal but are waiting for a formal commission. Once confirmed, they will consult with stakeholders and the suggestion of using West Library was noted. Please send ideas for small projects along the canal to: urvisha.mistry@groundwork.org.uk Del suggested signposting implementation through this project. The money, £6K, is available from a Section 106 agreement and from the Guardian. Urvisha also reminded us that information about events etc can always be included in the Islington Environment Forum newsletter which has wide circulation as well as on the IEF email list - contact details as above. 7. Date of next meeting: No date agreed at the meeting as next one due at the end of December, during holiday period. Note from Louisa: after consultation with Andrew & Ward Councillors, date of next meeting has been set as follows: Wednesday 31st January 2007 7pm - 9pm at London Canal Museum 12-13 New Wharf Road, N1 Addendum: For those not on e-mail contact: sadly, Mike Manuel of British Waterways died recently. Copies of e-mails circulated to the Friends of group are enclosed for those on the postal system. If FofRC would like to make a contribution to the memorial fund, this can be discussed at the next meeting.

Friends of Regents Canal (Islington) Minutes of meeting 27th June 2007 Diespeker Wharf, 38 Graham street, N1 Chair - Andrew Bedford. Attendance Louise Fishleigh British Waterways Lynn Hebblethwaite L.B.Islington Park Ranger Derek Keig L.B.Islington Park Ranger Chris Ashby Islington Cyclists Action Group Fiona MacLean London Narrow Boat Association Del Brenner Regents Network/London Waterways Commission Beryl Windsor Angel Canal Festival Jim Lagden Angel Canal Festival/Islington Museum Leo Chapman Regents Network/EC1 New Deal Gordon Meenn Camden Friends of Regents Canal/Reachview Court Residents Stephen Donaghy Pollard Thomas & Edwards Des Spellman Film/Local Resident Rob Inglis artsXchange Avis Baldry Resident Stephen Glass Chair, Friends of Wilton Square Andrew Bedford L.B.Islington Ecology & Ranger Manager (chair) Louisa Roscoe L.B.Islington Nature Conservation Ranger (minutes) 1. Welcome & introductions 2. Apologies Frances Welan Lisa Tang Lisa Pontecorvo Jon Guest Francis Chronnell Cllr Martin Klute Cllr Ruth Polling Cllr Marisha Ray Proposed agenda item on presentation of the Waterspace Strategy for City Road Basin has been postponed to the next meeting due to Islington Boat Club being unable to attend. Agenda items rearranged to accommodate those who needed to leave early. 3. Two tings campaign: presentation by Louise Fishleigh, British Waterways Awareness campaign has been done, a summary of what it entailed was distributed,& Groundwork's contribution outlined. The next stage: TfL has given £300,000 for this year: £250,000 from the Greenways Budget, and £50,000 from the Walking Budget. From this, a study has been commissioned to look at parallel routes on roads - CRISP study, and will work with the Boroughs. Question about what will happen about the few cyclists that don't abide by towpath guidelines: hopefully these are the ones who will divert to the parallel route as it will be faster; police are able to stop them. Safety improvements is a bigger subject than cyclists. Everyone welcomes safety initiative. The Councils have responsibility, along with BW. At Caledonian Rd end of the canal there have been issues of burnt out motorbikes, graffiti etc - Greenspace tackling this holistically, using Safer Neighbourhood Team, Magpie meetings, local residents & anglers to report anti-social behaviour to Community Police. Cllrs Ruth Polling, Marisha Ray and L.B. Islington are setting up a meeting with BW to tackle this issue. Different views expressed about how many resources BW has to deal with this. Reality regarding towpath is it will be a shared use path - TfL's policy is to get more people cycling, and BW's money for improvements is tied to TfL. Some expression of towpath feeling dangerous to use outside of busy times in terms of isolation. BW have a cyclist who patrols, and Islington have the Dog Patrol who can be called out. Police will patrol areas if they get lots of reports regarding the same area. Member of the group had a bag of rubbish deliberately thrown at her; reported to the police and it was investigated. Safety issues are everyone's responsibility to report. Support from meeting for Louise's work, shame not better resourced. Public education is the best way, a reinforcement campaign will take place at the end of the summer. Chicanes have been put in place - feed back shows some think they are pointless, others that it makes people slow down & think. Rumble strips with words SLOW & GIVEWAY have been put in place - and have shown that do make people think and modify behaviour. There will be some trials of getting cyclists to use alternative routes.There is a view that there will always be some cyclists who go too fast no matter what measures in place, just as with motorists. 4. Angel Canal Festival - presentation from Beryl Windsor This year's festival on 2nd Sept is the 21st year. Thanks to Jim Lagden for his work over the years. Costs £14000 to stage each year, 70% of this comes from fundraising, 30% from stalls. London Canal Museum have donated a birthday cake. This will be the last year with Packington area as it is - having a climbing tower there this year. Hanover School also involved for the first time. National Grid have currently dug up towpath right where festival takes place - finish date is mid-August. ACF have been in discussion with NG; also have a 'Plan B' if works not complete. Call for volunteers - just 2hours on the day. Beryl has arranged 'Band of Angels' events to encourage involvement. Holding an awareness day on the towpath on 15th July to get more local people involved. Friends of Wilton Square can offer volunteers for the festival, in return for borrowing ACF's sculptures. Funding from London Canals Committee - have not been able to access London Waterways Commission money - Del will raise at London Waterways Committee Action Towpath hut - used every year as festival base. Broken into in May. Council want to knock it down rather than repair, have agreed to at least wait until after this year's festival. Point made that hut could also be used at other times of year, is not just of use for the festival: City Rd Basin re-development is going to make this area the largest open space in Islington. Seems a waste of a potential resource - e.g. use as an information point on the towpath. Is not covered by conservation order and planning permission not required to remove it. Hut needs repairs to make it secure & watertight and Islington don't have resources to repair it. ACF have had quotes to repair it. Decision by Andrew: if ACF can repair it, Greenspace will not demolish the hut. Repairs can be by volunteers or contractors, just needs to be signed off by Greenspace as being in a fit & safe condition. Discussion widened to City Rd Basin issues: concerns still about master plan and loss & redesign of current playground; questions about how the civic space will be used and who will lead the management of the basin & entertainment; potential is great and local involvement important. 5. Matters Arising 5.3.2.2.4 Dog fouling: no enforcement powers yet, should be able to implement Oct/Nov 5.3.4 Councillors: individuals were invited and Cllr Martin Klute was asked for a specific topic - all apologised though. Deputy chairs: Lisa Tang and Chris Ashby have been nominated. Agreed by meeting, thanks to them both. 5.4 Packington Estate: meeting on Monday with Hyde Housing, Intermodal, LBI Councillors, Del, Leo & others - to look at use of waterway for construction works. Waste by water will also be raised - potential for taking lorries off the road. Will report back at next meeting. 6. AOB 6.1 Floating Islands Project Installation to take place 3rd July to 5th July. After consultation with range of stakeholders, agreement reached to install 60m at Ice Wharf Marina and 60m in canal alongside Ice Wharf and part of Regents Wharf. This is reduction of 30m as decided by BW to ensure islands remain in widest part of waterway. Question regarding if they cause problems with navigation - they will be anchored and so are moveable. Project will be monitored and there is a two year maintenance programme planned for follow up. Young people from Islington Boat Club will be doing litter-picking of the islands . Question as to why it's taken so long to realise the project - the consultation process was full and extensive, along with negotiations with BW - this all takes time. Sunday 8th July will be a community event to plant up two of the islands and install them with the help of Islington Boat Club. Support expressed by members of the group. 6.2 Vincent Terrace Cllr Klute secured some funds from S. Area Committee for improvements to Vincent Terrace, to be carried out by Nature Conservation Team. First stage of works has taken place this spring - repairs and repainting of railings, and native hedge planted along the length of the site. Second phase to take place in autumn: tree works and planting of native bulbs. 6.3 Kings Place Rob Inglis from artsXchange explained plans for festival at Kings Place. London Sinfonietta and the Orchestra of Enlightenment have been working with Bengali, Somali, Chinese and Italian musicians, planning a festival of music on boats next year, between Battlebridge Basin and Camley St. A small steering committee has been putting ideas together and applying for funding. Lisa Pontecorvo has been meeting with the Education Strategy Manager, Judith Webster and proposes that she attend FofRC to discuss ideas. Meeting welcomes Rob's plans and interested in Lisa's idea to have as agenda item at next meeting. Action Louisa to also invite Maria Bota, Director of Kings Place Music Foundation 9. Thanks to PTE for being such good hosts of this meeting. Date of next meeting: Wed 26th Sept 07

Friends of Regents Canal (FoRC), Islington February 2008 Attendance: Jim Lagden Angel Canal Festival/Islington Museum Suresh Basra British Waterways Lisa Pontecorvo (LP) Friends of Edward Square Gillian Comins Angel Association Chris Ashby Islington Cyclists Action Group Leo Chapman Regents Network Del Brenner Regents Network Gordon Meenn Camden Friends of Regents Canal Cllr Martin Klute London Borough of Islington Sandra Hoise Groundwork Ryan Kemp Huntington St. Resident Andrew Bedford (AB) London Borough of Islington Lynn Hebblethwaite London Borough of Islington Apologies: Councillor Convery Lisa Tang Frances Williams Minutes: 1) Future Support Arrangements for the Group Andrew Bedford expressed disappointment at low attendance numbers. Then introduced the issues to be discussed at this meeting. At the last meeting LBI set out changes within the council. Not able to offer same support to the group. People felt difficult for group to continue without support. An outline proposal for Groundwork to provide administrative support to the group. In the past Groundwork facilitated the Camden end of Regents Canal. There are many different interest groups involved in the canal. Good News - Jim Lagden was awarded the Outstanding Contribution to Volunteering Award by Islington Volunteer Centre on Monday evening Andrew read through this statement from Groundwork: To support Friends of Regent's Canal (Islington) quarterly meetings Groundwork will: 1 Hold and up-date a database of Friends of Canal contacts (initially supplied by either LBI or Friends of Canal). 2 Agree agendas with the Chair/LBI in advance of meetings. 3 Email out agendas to the database in advance of meetings (where people wish to receive a hard copy we will post these out). 4 Make necessary arrangements for the meetings (eg room bookings, refreshments, booking guest speakers, etc). 5 Attend meetings and take minutes. 6 Write up minutes and circulate these via email and/or hard copy within an agreed timeframe. 7 We can carry out occasional additional tasks for the Friends if requested as long as these are reasonable and not hugely time consuming (eg finding out some information and reporting back to the Friends). Though we would need to review this against the budget if these became frequent. (Note: We recognise that Groundwork would have "two hats" that of supporting the Friends but also as an organisation working on the canal. We would aim to keep these functions separate where possible to ensure that we provide the best support we can. For example if we were to attend the Friends meeting in the capacity of an organisation working on the canal then we would send 2 members of staff and would not charge the second persons time to this work - this enables the note taker to focus on taking notes, etc). If there are any additional tasks you would like us to carry out as part of this work (eg edit a Friends of Regents Canal newsletter) then we would be happy to include these and provide a cost estimate. Lisa Pontecorvo asked whether the funds available to pay Groundwork would be available to pay for another person within the council. Andrew highlighted that the money available only represents a small proportion of a post and that the Groundwork proposal represents good value for the council but without extra pressure on existing resources. Chris Ashby was encouraged by the proposal of support from Groundwork. Islington Environment Forum has a similar set up with Groundwork taking minutes and that is working well. He was concerned that if there was no long the presence of a senior council officer it will mean that the group would have less 'clout' and British Waterways will no longer attend. He expressed concerns over issues with developers and had concerns around finding the correct chair. Sandra Hoise was asked to explain the role that Groundwork would be taking on. They would have a designated officer to take care of the administrative tasks relating to the group. But as they also are involved in projects along the canal to ensure that there is no conflict of interest a different officer from the one providing admin support would attend the meeting to present or report back on the project. Lisa Pontecorvo expressed her concerns about Groundwork having both roles and also said that she was concerned about the Tiber Gardens project they are involved in at present. Sandra replied that this would be purely an administrative and other roles would be kept separate. Chris was concerned that the group would no long be able to get senior officers to attend. Andrew felt that Groundwork were better placed to do the leg work in between meetings to ensure that officers were invited in plenty of time and that this would actually be an advantage to the group. Lisa said that in her experience people are normally flattered to be asked to present at a meeting. Gillian Comins felt that the group should chair the group that it should identify a chair and have a clearly defined role and that Andrew should no longer chair. Andrew clarified that Greenspace has no intention of abandoning the group and will remain a key stakeholder and partner. He did mention that wearing the two hats that of chair and that of council officer has been very difficult on occasions. Del Brenner apologised for lateness. He accepts the lack of chair from the group. He welcomed admin support for the group and felt that it was needed. He would like to see this as a more active organisation and less of a talking shop. At present it doesn't have aims and simply responds to developments. Now that the administration is settled the group must organise a different chair. It is important to set this group off to get things done on the canal. Suresh Basra confirmed that he is able to attend future meetings as a representative of British Waterways and can feed back to the relevant officers within British Waterways, there will be a British Waterways representative at these meetings. Andrew has been assured that if specific issues come up then officers concerned with that individual issue will attend for those specific items. Del felt that one of the objectives of the group should be to bring the waterways back to life. The waterways in Islington doesn't belong to Islington but Islington has responsibility for certain areas. Its part of a larger waterways network. It is important that we link to other parts of the canal i.e. Camden and Hackney. He showed the meeting Hackney's 'Conservation Area Appraisal' for their section of the Regent's Canal. From York Way through to Camden is a conservation area, Del feels that more joined up thinking is needed. Also financing of the group could be spread if we looked into the possibility of bringing in other boroughs. Andrew explained that is was debated as an option at a previous meeting and refused so it was not cost out this time. Gillian felt that the group needs a chair and also an outline constitution with aims written down. Last meeting Leo circulated a document for people to read but it was not discussed at the meeting, she felt that a better system was needed for setting agenda items. Jim Lagden felt that the reasons the groups doesn't have a chair is that they can't see the point as there's not a burning aim. The group needs aims and how to get the power to do these things. As no one outside of these meetings know what this group stands for. Chris felt that the group looks after the canal and battles with developers. Jim said that they are operating in a vacuum. Gillan felt that you get a much better chair if someone doesn't feel tied to the role with no end in sight. Chris said that he had volunteered to be joint deputy chairs are good. Could we still hold the meetings in the current buildings? Andrew the organisations would like to support the group more because it is a voluntary group more than it's association with the council. Chris asked if the meeting will still have planners attending and British Waterways to come along. Can this be guaranteed? Andrew there is no reason why it would change. It is a key group to consult within planning and it was key with the Packington development. It could be strengthened as unless you have a constitution you cannot give a formal response to a proposal. Lisa felt that it is important for the group to be independent and to have a constitution. The council need people to consult. Previously the worry was the administration now that makes things easier. Friends of Edward Square does not have a chair. She suggested taking rotating chair or vice chair. There is a need a chairing system and not necessarily a chair. Jim felt that a formal document is important. Del the group needs terms of reference or guidelines a vision. Hasn't got any authority but it has had influence. The chair doesn't need to be from the group. People within the group want to have their say so perhaps we should look outside. The groups needs to be proactive and visionary and as to link with other people. Broader scale regenerating the canal and that means getting boats onto the canal. Lisa felt that it is Del's job to make that link with this group. Cllr Klute Welcomes the offer of Groundwork support. It is impartial and opens up the possibility of expansion to adjoining boroughs. Suggests conclusions to accept the council's offer the chair issue is more contentious and this should be voted on next meeting. Andrew outlined the options available for chairing 1 Rotating chair 2 Set period of one year 3 By invitation (independent) Chris felt that the chair needs to be someone with a passion for the canal. Andrew proposed that the group accept the Groundwork proposal It was agreed by the group unanimously. This arrangement will be trialled for a year and reviewed after a one year period. Cllr Klute asked on what basis it was to be trialled Andrew answered on the basis this is successful there is a commitment from the council at officer level to fund this arrangement for three years. Gillian thanked Andrew Andrew said that Greenspace is committed to Regents Canal and to the group. 2) Future Chairing and Structure of the Group Del felt that the chair needs to be someone dedicated. We could have the current deputy chairs. Who should chair the next meeting? Is Andrew prepared to continue. Andrew would like to stand down on a personal perspective, he has chaired for the past five years but will still be involved as a stakeholder. Cllr Klute how would we structure it? Andrew we could invite the chair and put it as a substantive item on the next meeting's agenda. Cllr Klute proposed a 1 year chair with one of the vice chairs to begin the meeting with support from Groundwork. Gordon Meenn felt that the chair's job is not too large or too onerous. Andrew suggested the possibility of re-election. It was agreed that the group are to invite people to stand for chair reviewed after one year or can be re-elected or stand down. Chris Ashby or Lisa Tang to chair the next meeting Del asked if we could propose other people outside the group? Cllr Klute suggested that it should be decided by a vote so anyone could be invited. Andrew agreed Lisa said that constitution should outline areas of work or deal with problems. Andrew the third thing to discuss is should the group have Terms of Reference or a Constitution Gillian suggests a subcommittee should write the terms of reference. Andrew suggested that there should be a vote either way. Jim supported Terms of Reference but not a constitution The principle of Terms of Reference will be deferred to a sub group. 3) AOB Future agenda items Del proposed Freight and he can set this up. Andrew asked if this could be in the form of a presentation. Del proposed that we should make each meeting more of an event Gillian proposed the alternative on road cycle route presentation by Howard Piper, British Waterways and TfL joint project. Lisa Biennale Festival, invite Florence from British Waterways to talk about this Del asked that some information about the Biennale event be e-mailed around. Lisa 9th July Edward Square will have a mini Handel's Water Music with Copenhagen School. The large canal festival Rob Inglis proposed at a previous meeting will be postponed until next year. Some of the work done for this will be showcased at the Biennale. Lisa asked about Tiber Gardens Andrew Cllr Polling and Cllr Convery will be meeting Andrew to discuss. Ryan can this be circulated to the group? Del wanted to know when the consultation on the Waterspace Strategy was going to take place? Date of next meeting: 28th May Diespeaker Wharf

Friends of Regents Canal (FoRC), Islington Wednesday May 28th 2008 Diespeker Wharf, 38 Graham Street, N1 Chair - Lisa Tang Present: Lisa Tang (LT) Chair Gordon Meenn (GM) Camden Friends of Regents Canal Andrew Bedford (AB) London Borough of Islington (LBI) Des Spellman (DS) Local Resident Lynn Hebblethwaite (LH) LBI Greenspace Lisa Pontercovo (LP) FREDS Fiona Maclean (FM) LNBA/LNBC Andrew Bedford (AB) Greenspace Chris Ashby (CA) ICAG Ryan Kemp (RK) Huntington St. Resident Florence Saltberter (FS) British Waterways (BW) Sam Thomas (ST) British Waterways Caroline Hickey (CH) Capacity- Community Organisations Lorraine Fox (LF) Eco-sandwich barge/local boater Ashleigh Wight (AW) Boater Catherine Gleeson (CG) Local resident- Wharf Basin Catherine O'Shea (CO'S) Resident- Sturts Lock Moorings Leo Chapman (LC) Regents Network Anna Walnycki (AW) Secretary, FoRC Apologies: Cllr Martin Klute Cllr Ruth Polling Beryl Windsor Francis Williams Gillian Commins 1. Welcome and introductions 2. Regents Canal and the London festival of Architecture Florence Salberter, Heritage Advisor, British Waterways Florence Salberter of BW told the group about the planned events along the canal between Camden and Islington as part of the London Festival of Architecture. When: Thursday 4th -Sunday 6th July 2008 Where: Regent's Canal between the Islington Tunnel and St Pancras Lock What: Regent's Canal: A Fresh Perspective part of London Festival of Architecture 2008 The Regent's Canal will be buzzing with a packed schedule of activities as part of the London Festival of Architecture 2008: walks, talks, events and information points all along the canal, there will be plenty to see and do. To see the full programme of events please visit www.refreshregentscanal.co.uk. The events scheduled include guided walks on Thursday and Friday lunchtime with FS and Louisa Roscoe giving local residents/workers who live near the canal the opportunity to take time to find out more about its history and wildlife. Bob Gilbert, Assistant Director for Environmental Sustainability at LBI's Environmental Sustainability Division will give a talk on Wildlife on canals on Thursday evening between 7.30 - 9pm at The Canal Museum. On Friday, LR and FS will lead a guided walk along the towpath between Islington Tunnel and St Pancras Lock, for people working locally, discussing the history and wildlife of the area from 12.30 onwards. A guided walk of Regents Canal from The Canal Museum to Camley St. will be held from 2.30pm on Saturday. From 10am until 5pm on Sunday, the BW boat 'Jena' will be moored along the canal as an info point throughout the day: The work of Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners will be showcased through display from the period of 2002-2008 and provide fun activities, looking at the historic architecture and biodiversity along the canal. Please click on main link for more information about whole LFA festival http://www.lfa2008.org/event.php?id=629&name=Regent%27s+Canal%3A+A+Fresh+Perspective%3A+Thornhill+Bridge+Community+GardenersISSUES FS told the groups that cyclists would not be banned from the canal for the event, but, that as the majority of activities are on a Sunday, it is unlikely that there would be any high speed commuter cyclists. There will be signs at key access points and volunteer stewards to man the towpaths. LT thanked FS for her presentation. FS extended thanks to members of the community such as Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners and local businesses such as Canal 125 who have volunteered to contribute to and support the festival. Several members asked whether there had been sufficient publicity to local people, to ensure that local residents and businesses are able to attend. RK suggested some small posters should be put in the shop windows of Caledonian Road. LP suggested that posters be distributed to local schools and pubs. FS said BW would consider these options. AB suggested there was a balance to be made between letting people know and encouraging so many people that over crowding occurs. 3. Minutes from last meeting and matters arising Minutes were agreed apart from Dells name being mis-spelt LT conveyed the plans for herself and LP to form a culture and arts sub-group as part of Team Cally http://northkingscross.typepad.co.uk/teamcally/ (unfinished website) As there are now two major orchestras at Kings Place and many artists are based in the area, perhaps this could lead to some sort of alternative art festival being held in the area, to which the group agreed 4. Nomination of chair and election AB introduced the item to nominate and elect a chair. Having received the nomination of LT from CA he asked if there were any other nominations. LF asked what the aims of FoRC were. AB responded that it was an information sharing and discussion groups for canal issues, which linked the activities of two Camden and Islington canal groups. LF asked if any boaters were involved. GM told the group that FoRC was formed to encourage canal use by all sorts of groups. LF said that as a boater she was affected by noise along the canal; does the group discuss issues of canal neighbourhood safety, and the need to lock gates along the canal. AB responded that gates are no longer locked along the canal in Islington. RK suggested that it might be useful for LF to attend one of the regular meetings of her local safer neighbourhood team that meet every 4 to 6 weeks. AB then reminded the groups of the decision at a previous meeting to set the task of deciding the aims and objectives of the group to a sub group. AB then asked if everyone was in agreement that LT should be the next chair.All members present backed the motion Issues LT then suggested that the groups have a rotating chair. CH commented on her own experience of working with community groups. She had been working with a community group who were made up of 4 sub-groups each of which had chair, the four chairs then came together to propose meeting agendas t the group. This formation seemed to work well. LP then suggested that CA could rotate the chair with LT, while AB could be at hand to step in if neither chair was available. CA responded that although he agreed to be deputy chair in the past, he had only done it to keep the meetings rolling along. CA chose to nominate LT as he felt her passion for the canal, the fact she has lived near the canal and had been involved in canal activities meant she was in a better position to take the chair. CA didn't feel it was appropriate for him, as someone who does not live near the canal. In light of the recent change in administration CA felt that LT would be in the best position to take up the chair for the next 4 meetings.LT accepted but suggested that AB be available to step in when necessary. The group agreed unanimously. 5. AOB LT told the group about 15 volunteers who came down to the canal with Thames 21 that day. They had planted hundreds of wildflowers, painted railings and pruned along the canal between York Way and Islington tunnel. LT then told the group that there were volunteer days for local community members along the canal that were being organised by Islington Ecology Centre. Several people who attended for the first time that evening commented that they had never come across FoRC before. They only attended that evening because they saw posters along the canal. LH suggested that we might need to advertise the group more widely. LP suggested that FoRC could be represented at the 'Love Your Parks' event in June RK suggested that all local 'Friends of' groups could be advertised on LBI's website AW suggested that more posters could be put up in different areas. RK and LP suggested the posters be extended to schools, pubs and other amenitiesLF asked of notices could be put in the notice boards along the canal ST told the group the display cases were reserved for specific notices and were not open to all groups. CA suggested that AW could extend the invite out to the Islington Environment Forum mailing list AW agreed and confirmed she would get posters and flyers advertising the meeting a few weeks in advance of the next. LT asked the small group that attended for a FoRC meeting for the first time that evening, if they could tell the group a little bit more about their proposed business for the canal. CO'S told the group that they had applied to have an eco-friendly organic sandwich bar with a pedal powered juicer and solar panels that would be based on a fixed boat. She then asked the group if they would have any objections to that sort of business along the canal. ST reminded the individuals that any business would have to apply to BW for a licence to operate along the canal. LC told the group that it was now highly unlikely that the two towers planned for the end of the canal would go up, as the credit crunch had had negative impacts on the companies responsible for putting them up. CF asked whether there would be increased security for the social housing along the canal, to reflect the increased security attached to the private development son the opposite side of the canal. RK suggested that residents concerned with safety issues should go along to the Safer Neighbourhoods Team's (SNT) meeting for the St Peter'sarea. LT suggested that FoRc could invite the local SNT along to a future meeting. AB gave an update on the new dog control laws; consultation has just finished and LBI are looking to start enforcing the new laws from July 1st. Several officers will be able to enforce the new by laws including Park Patrol and PCSOs. The initial period will attempt to educate dog owners, and then fines will be implemented. LT asked whether this meant that there would be more officers along the canal to enforce the new rules. AB told the group there would be additional Park Patrols, during the interim he advised towpath users to contact park patrol on 07970 893588 if they observed dog owners allowing their dogs to fowl the footpath. AB recommended that towpath users shouldn't take pictures of dog fowlers to inform the park patrols; instead he suggested that dog walkers often walked their dogs at the same time and place, so a description along with the time should be sufficient. ST suggested you could also pass information about dog fowlers on to BW LC suggested that dogs needed places to go and that there was a play area for dogs near Finsbury Park leisure centre. If anyone is interested please get in contact with the secretary and she will pass LC details on. 6. Future meetings LT sets date for next meeting as Wednesday September 24th, 7pm at the Canal Museum Suggested agenda items for the next meeting included an update on planning around proposed and ongoing projects along the canal. LC will pursue this as an agenda item and AW will conduct some further research. AB told the group that he would meet with LT to discuss potential aims and objectives for FoRC which could then be raised as an agenda item at the next meeting. LT suggested feedback from the Angel Canal Festival and the London Festival or Architecture as an agenda item LP suggested a 'News from the canal' as agenda item, so that those who live and work along the canal can share their news.

Friends of Regents Canal (FoRC), Islington Wednesday 24th September 2008 Canal Museum, 12-13 New Wharf Road, N1 Chair - Lisa Tang Present: Lisa Tang (LT) Chair Beverley Dean (BD) Angel Association Ruth Hargraves (RH) Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners Bhupesh Thapa (BT) LBI Greenspace Ranger Del Brenner (DB) Regent's Network/ London Waterways Commission Jim Lagden (JL) CRABS Helen Hawker (HH) St. Pancras Cruising Club Leo Chapman (LC) Regent's Network Julie Henderson (JH) Barnade Bill (?) Andrew Bedford (AB) LBI Greenspace Gillian Comins (GC) Angel Association Sandra Hoisz (SH) Groundwork, FoRC Secretary Chris Ashby Apologies: Cllr Polling, Anna Strongman - Argent Andrew Phasey - St. Pancras Cruising Club 1. Welcome and Introductions LT highlighted that Lisa Pontercovo was an active member of the group and that she will be fondly remembered. 2. Minutes of last meeting and matters arising SH informed the group that Anna Walnycki has left Groundwork. SH has taken over as FoRC secretary. SH confirmed that posters were put up to advertise the meeting. DB fed back that the font is too small. Action: Increase font size Minutes were agreed. 3. British Waterways representative Jamey France JF did not attend the meeting. 4. Feedback from the London Festival of Architecture and Angel Canal Festival Both events were successful and well attended: 450 people attended the water tower tour 300 visited Camely St More than 300 used the water taxi 277 people visited the canal museum More than 100 people visited the Jenna LT fed back that the festival will take place again in 2010. LC proposed to thank Florence Salberter for work put in to make the festival a success. All agreed. LC asked if the open space in front of 268 will be public open space. AB said that he has signed off landscaping for the planning permission and confirmed that the land will be publicly accessible. The scheme is scheduled to be completed in December. The path in front of the old electricity building connects to the space. John Norman (LBI Planning) to seek clarification regarding locking arrangements. DB asked for confirmation of opening arrangements and has drafted a letter to Cllr Foxsmith to ensure that the open space will be in the public realm. AB said that he is in discussion with John Norman and that a sign will be put up to say that the space will become a public open space. LC voiced concern that the residents might want to keep the space private and that the space would only become public open space if the other block beside it gets built. What are the consequences and impacts, if the development doesn't take place? LT suggested that John Norman is invited to the next FoRC meeting. Action: Invite JN to next FoRC meeting LC suggested that the letter to Cllr Foxsmith could be duplicated and sent on behalf of the FoRC. Action: Send letter to Cllr Foxsmith on behalf of FoRC DB informed the group that the Regent's Canal Musical was performed in various places, inc. the canal museum, and that it was a very good production. LT added that there are plans to perform it at major venues e.g. the Shaw Theatre. 5. Friends of Regent's Canal Terms of Reference LT informed the group that a sub group consisting of four members produced draft terms of reference for discussion. Sheena Gladding from LBI Greenspace helped to develop the draft TOR. LT handed out copies of the draft TOR and asked people to comment. AB provided some context and explained that the group has operated for a long time without TOR. He suggested that it would be useful to set ToR to formally set up what the FoRC are about; a constituted group would be able to fundraise. DB felt that the ToR needed more than tweaking. He pointed out that the document is not a constitution (item 2). DB felt that the group can't be independent if it's working partnership. Action: Change wording LT pointed out that the FoRC are already working in partnership with LBI and GWK. GC said that she understands what is meant by it; the group shouldn't lose its informality and should continue to focus on bringing people with different points of view together. DB suggested to change the wording from "working in partnership with" to "working with". DB stressed that he is not happy with the draft. AB pointed out that at the last meeting the group tasked a sub group to developed draft ToR. The draft is based on a template, based on comments and feedback the document can be re-drafted. BD felt that the TOR encompasses the spirit of the group. LT suggested that all members should be invited to comment on the ToR by e-mail and another discussion should be had at the next meeting. DB felt that the focus of the group- the waterways and the Regent's Canal- is lacking and it's too management focused. DB handed out ToR he had drafted in note form and the London's Blue Ribbon Network leaflet. DB pointed out that the London Plan is a good document and that waterways are dealt within the plan, the principals of the BRN are similar to what's in the ToR and posed the question if the ToR are simply duplicating what's in the London plan. He pointed out that the plan has gone through extensive consultation and drafting and that the FoRC shouldn't do anything without consultation. LT responded that ToR would still be useful to give people an idea of what the FoRC are about and to provide local context. LT agreed that ToR should go out to consultation. HH agreed that the FoRC fit within the BRN umbrella and pointed out that it makes sense to stay focused at a local level. LC liked the background in DB's draft and suggested that background should be added to the ToR. ToR are useful to give the group more of an identity and to outline how we see ourselves and how we want to present ourselves to the outside world. LT questioned DB about the management section of his draft DB explained that he felt strongly that the management committee shouldn't be able to make any decisions without consulting the group first. He asked if the management committee would meet in between FoRC meetings and asked for clarification about the roles of the management committee. LT responded that the committee would not meet separately, the group would carry on as per usual. Members would take on officer roles to support the group. Action: DB to forward ToR to SH LC is in favour or more meetings as a lot can happen in between meetings. LT and AB pointed out that this might not be feasible as it would have financial implications in terms of venue hire and admin support. JH felt that the map on the back of DB's ToR is helpful and should be incorporated into the ToR. All agreed AB explained that LBI manage the towpath on behalf of BW, up to Sturt's Lock and that boundaries, as shown on DB's map, should be redrawn to reflect the area that is managed by LBI. The group also takes into consideration what's happening in the neighbouring boroughs, the St. Pancras Cruising Club, for example, is located in LB Camden. AB mentioned that as an independent group the FoRC could be campaigning, if there is consensus within the group, for example commenting on planning applications. DB is not happy with the logo and handed out a sheet containing alternative logo designs, showing the iconic image of the Islington tunnel. JH felt that the logo should reflect the towpath and the aims of the group. BD likes both logo ideas and pointed out that the bottom right logo (on DB's hand out) shows the towpath and vegetation and pointed out that this logo would work very well in B&W and colour. LT suggested that FoRC members should be given the opportunity to vote on their favourite logo. GC thanked the sub committee for drafting the TOR. JL has set up the City Road Basin Support Group. The group will start having public meetings soon. The group is aimed at people who live around the basin. LT asked if the group will come a constituted group JL responded that he is not sure yet. LT asked if it would be helpful if the FoRC disseminated information. Action: FoRC to disseminate City Road Basin Support Group information. JL felt that the more people who know about it, the better. GC Angel Association could publicise it in their newsletter. JL said that he attended the opening of the Plaza, which was not well publicised. The event was organised by Groveworld. RH invited everyone to a Free Family Fest organised by Drayton Park and Highbury Field Schools - date tbc AB informed the group that Lynne (the LBI Greenspace ranger who used to cover the canal) had left Greenspace and that BT is covering her role. BT informed the group that Thames 21 organised a two day clean up event just before the Canal Festival. They did a good job. LT enquired about the status of the park patrol. AB responded that they are authorised to fine people , they cover the towpath and operate on an intelligence basis. A memorial service for LP will be held in Edward Square on 14 Nov, time tbc LT added the memorial will take place at midday to give people a chance to come during their lunch break. DB mentioned that the waterways strategy needs to be consulted on. Action: DB to find out when consultation will start LC suggested that John Norman should be invited to the next meeting. Date of next meeting: Wednesday 14 January 2009 Diespeker Wharf, 7-9 pm For more information please contact Sandra Hoisz (Friends of Regent's Canal Secretary) via Groundwork on 020 7239 1389 or e-mail Sandra.Hoisz@groundwork.org.uk

Friends of Regents Canal (FoRC), Islington Wednesday 14th January 2009 Diespeker Wharf, Graham Street, N1 Chair - Lisa Tang Present: Lisa Tang (LT) Chair (Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners) Ruth Hargraves (RH) Edna Wilson (EW) Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners Del Brenner (DB) Regent's Network/ London Waterways Commission Jim Lagden (JL) CRABS Leo Chapman (LC) Regent's Network Andrew Bedford (AB) LBI Greenspace Gillian Comins (GC) Angel Association Sandra Hoisz (SH) Groundwork, FoRC Secretary Buhpesh Thapa (BT) LBI Greenspace Mike Myles Groveworld James Lazerus BW Laura Cudd Resident Eric Sorenson Angel Association Edna Wilson TBCG Beryl Windsor Angel Canal Festival Stephen Burt St. Pancras Cruising Club Theo Thomas Thames 21 Loraine Fox Resident Ian Shacklock Resident Chris Ashby Islington Cycling Action Group Murad Qureshi AM GLA/ London Waterways Commission Jeremy Pudney Harley Sherlock Apologies: Cllr Polling, Cllr Foxsmith Cllr Convery Cllr Klute Frances Wellen Fiona McLean Sam Thomas Tom Clarke Beverley Dean Helen Hawker 1. Welcome and Introductions YMCA handed out leaflets regarding the Jubilee Sports Centre. They'd like to find how the centre should be developed to provide a range of activities and services for residents, workers and visitors. Please direct any feedback to the YMCA. 2. Minutes of last meeting and matters arising Chris Ashby not on attendee list. Statements made by Leo Chapman wrongly attributed to CA. Minutes were agreed. 3. Presentations Murad Qureshi AM, Deputy Chair of Environment Committee, London Assembley 1 Presentation on the London Waterways Commission, London Plan and Blue Ribbon Network 2 Issues: Freight and transport, passengers, board yards, events and tourism, tributaries, flooding. 3 Vision: to extend the Thames Festival, to extend mayoral powers over the waterways; aspirations for river transport to be more co-ordinated and to have a memorandum of understanding; safeguarding the wharfs; "Blue Markings" of lost rivers and redressing the litter problem. Mike Myles, Groveworld and James Lazerus, BW 4 The residential development will open up the basin for the first time in decades. 5 The master plan was adopted in 2004 and provides a framework for future development. 6 Public benefits include direct pedestrian access from City Road, residential units, mooring facilities, new boat club facilities, Angel Waterside and linear park (completed in 07.08) 7 Groveworld will move into new offices mid February 2009. 8 Estimated completion date for the plaza is March 2009 and will include soft and hard landscaping, direct access from City Road, lighting scheme and planting arrangements 9 259 and 261 City Road: demolition has begun. 10 Boat club sites: planning permission has not yet been granted, plans include new boat club, 2nd phase linear park and residential units. 11 LT asked if a landscape assessment has been carried out. 12 MM responded that the site is on top of an electricity sub station- there is limited ability for more biodiversity; the linear park extends down to the existing park. 13 AB confirmed that Groveworld have worked with LBI Greenspace; AB signed off the landscaping plan. 14 LT said that the linear park is not being used by the public; hopefully the public will start to use the site once the public realm space has opened in March. 15 AB mentioned that there needs to be signage to inform residents that the site is going to become public open space. 16 DB added that the linear park is not public open space yet and that residents assume that it's their private park. 17 MM will speak to the managing agent. 18 DB asked for clarification about what is and isn't public open space. 19 AB answered that the s106 agreement requires public access, this needs to be communicated to residents. 20 CA asked what the opening hours will be. 21 AB answered that certain parts will be open 24hours a day, while fenced parts will be locked and have normal park opening hours. 22 HS pointed out that attitudes to canals have changed for the better- that's great news! 23 LC asked what the impact of the economic crisis will be on the 259 development. Will it be built? 24 JL answered that the 259 consortium is exploring phasing the scheme: affordable housing to be completed first; the boat club terms have not yet been agreed with LBI. 25 MQ suggested that considering the economic circumstances a gentler scale would make sense. 26 JL said that delivery options are being explored. 27 LT expressed concern about the height of the towers and asked how they add to the space. 28 JL responded that it's a matter of opinion. 29 MM stressed the community benefit, by opening up the basin and that the vision is for people to use the site as they use the towpath. 30 DB said that downsizing would be welcome and that the open space was leverage for towers; open space enabled £2m GOL funding and that the open space could have been achieved without the towers. 31 MM responded that £2m was only part of the project cost and that the total cost was nearly £6m; the open space would not have been achievable without developers and s106 contribution; £2m was on top of developer's obligation and stressed that Groveworld surpassed obligation. 32 ES said that not everyone opposes buildings, it depends on the design and how they integrate with open space. 33 JB wanted to know if a circular route could be created. 34 JL answered that that's difficult in the boat club section; commercial arrangements with LBI are currently being finalised and detailed designs are being produced, indicative time-scales are: 9 months to finalise the scheme and to put it in for planning, 3-6 months planning, detailed works drawings: 3-4 months, tender period: 3 months, construction 15 months - 2½ years in normal economic circumstances. 35 HS stated that he prefers the basin as it is rather than with the tower blocks. 36 JB said that NE corner, Pickford Wharf, will be quasi privatised- will access be given? 37 JL responded "yes, probably" 38 AB said that the space will be managed by a management company. Has this been put in place? The plaza would be a prime space for the canal festival, would it be available? 39 JL/ MM - yes through BW. 40 MQ asked what BW's interest is. 41 MM responded that BW are the land holder around the basin and their business model is to engage with the developer; BW are enablers of the scheme and bring amenity and public benefit to the scheme. 42 MM stressed that the masterplan was thoroughly consulted on and adopted in 2004. 43 CA asked what will be done to make the boat club detour more attractive to encourage people to visit the NE corner. 44 MM responded that this will be dealt with in the detailed design. 45 DB and LC requested that the developers explore if it is economically viable to bring in and carry away materials using the waterways. 46 MM distributed copies of the brochure providing more detailed information about the development. 47 The civic open space will opened by early March. 4. Any other business New signage: Seema Manchanda to provide an update. Action: Invite Seema Manchanda to the next FoRC meeting LBI won't manage the public open space. It will be managed by a new management company. BW asked if residents were told that it will be public open space. AB responded that it should be clear from people's leases. AB confirmed that the planning application for the South Basin is now live. Date of next meeting: Wednesday 6 May 2009 Islington Canal Museum, 7-9 pm For more information please contact Sandra Hoisz (Friends of Regent's Canal Secretary) via Groundwork on 020 7239 1389 or e-mail Sandra.Hoisz@groundwork.org.uk

Friends of Regents Canal (FoRC), Islington Wednesday 17th June 2009 Islington Canal Museum, Wharf Rd, N1 Chair - Lisa Tang Present: Lisa Tang (LT) Chair (Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners) Bupesh Thapa LBI Greenspace Fiona McLean LNBC Beverley Dean Angel Association Eric Sorensen Angel Association Edna Wilson Resident & TBCG Seema Manchanda LBI Ian Shacklock Islington Boat Club Chris Ashby ICAG Leo Chapman Regent's Network Del Brenner Regent's Network & London Waterways Commission Sam Thomas BW Cllr Martin Klute LBI Howard Piper Angel Community Canal Boat Trust Francis Balfour Islington Society Felicity Mcclintock BW Joe Young BW Gordon Meen Reachview Ct Resident Apologies: Theo Thomas Beryl Windsor Andrew Bedford Welcome and Introductions LT passed around Ryan Camp's obituary. Ryan was a valued member of the group. LT paid tribute to Jim Lagden. He was a regular attendee and was instrumental in setting up and supporting the Islington Canal Festival and the Islington Museum. He is sadly missed. A boat trip took place on 24th June in memory of Jim. An invite was passed round at the meeting. Minutes of last meeting and matters arising DB requested that items are numbered. Action: SH to action LC requested update on the linear park and public access from Pickford Wharf LT fed back that the YMCA bid to take over the Jubilee Centre was unsuccessful Minutes were agreed. Presentations Seema Manchanda, Islington Council 1 LT introduced Seema and provided context by explaining that Amanda Peck from the Planning Dept used to regularly attend FORC meetings. She further requested that the FORC should be considered a main consultation group and that an ongoing dialogue would be welcome. 2 SM apologiesed for cancelling her attendance of the last meeting. SM is the Service Director for Strategic Planning and Regeneration. She has a broad remit, including planning policy, major developments that the council leads on and GIS. She does not cover development control. She is managed by the Executive Director, Kevin O'Leary. 3 She handed out the City Road Basin masterplan document. 4 261 and 259 have received planning permission. 5 Fidelity lead on areas 3 & 4 (as per masterplan document) and Groveworld on 5. 6 Number 1 is already built. 7 DB enquired about planning consent. 8 Planning consent for area 5 expires in December 2009 and for area 4 in December 2011. Planning consent expires at different times because applications were submitted either side of the planning rules change. 9 Groveworld scheme at 259 City Rd (Area 5) consists of a tower and a large block: 202 private and 93 affordable units. The scheme at 261 consists of 300 units, 1/3 of which are affordable. 10 Boat club: general agreement reached; market conditions are difficult for developers; LBI works with developers to kick start schemes. The Homes and Communities Agency is a recently set up body and an amalgamation of English Partnerships, CLG and the Housing Corporation. The agency supports affordable housing and provides resources to kick start schemes that have permission. LBI are working with developers (inc Groveworld) on a bid to the HCA. 11 DB asked if it wouldn't be more viable if a revised proposal, without a podium and with a lower building, was submitted? 12 LC expressed concern that public monies are being spent a private block (259). 13 SM responded that social housing is an integral part of the scheme and that equity will be returned under certain conditions. 14 HP enquired if consent had been obtained for 2 & 6? 15 Planning is anticipated to start quickly if they can kick start 259 quickly. 16 DB added that to kick start the scheme public funding needs to be made available to property developers. 17 SM pointed out that if funding isn't spent on these schemes resources would be allocated to other (non LBI) schemes. 18 ES added that HCA's business is to give monies to private developers. 19 HW asked how Fidelity are doing. 20 Fidelity are a pension fund investor and as such have more time and are able to take a longer term view. They didn't take up the offer of the kick start fund. Demolition is being carried out at the moment. 21 DB suspects that they will sell the site once the market picks up. 22 SM will check if terms have been signed for areas 2 & 6. Action: SM to check 23 DB wanted to be assured that the development of the water and mooring goes out to consultation before anything is agreed. 24 HW asked what, if anything, has been agreed in regards to the water and mooring. Action: SM to check 25 Cllr Klute added that the PTE will develop a drawing of the water. A drawing was produced a few years ago and is in circulation. 26 HW mentioned mooring for narrow boats and that plans had been put forward 27 LT asked for an update on the public realm and the linear park. 28 DB asked if it states in residents' leases that it's a private space. 29 SM confirmed that it is a public space. 30 LT felt that it would be useful if signage was put up as it looks private and that there should be an emphasis on the fact that it is a public space. 31 SM said that once the square is opened up it will feel like an open space and suggested that the council finds out how the space operates before putting up any signs (if required). 32 DB added that tall towers will enclose the open space. 33 Cafés are incorporated into Fidelity scheme (1-2 units). The square will be accessible from City Rd inc. ramped access. 34 FB enquired if planting that encourages bees and biodiversity had been considered. 35 ST fed back that BW has launched a bee awareness campaign. 36 LT added that Louise Roscoe of Greenspace did a lot of work to identify sites for biodiversity planting. Andrew Bedford agreed planting plan with Groveworld. 37 HP pointed out that the canal is a park and that there is too much concrete, bare earth and high volume of traffic. 38 DB said that the previous plan included glass panels, which don't seem to be included anymore. 39 SM responded that the glass panels are associated with the towers, they are still included in pending permission. 40 CA wanted assurance that the scheme would be cycling friendly. SM to look into cycle parking 41 FML asked if there will be residential mooring at the north end and if there will be any visitor moorings. 42 LC said that planning application for the basin on the other side has been submitted. Could the historic basin be re-opened and refilled. 43 SM added that officers have put the scheme forward for recommendation. Re-opening the basin is unlikely to happen. 44 Please see attachment for motion from the FORC that the planning brief should be brought up to date to emphasise filling up the basin. 45 LT thanked SM and asked for relevant officers from SM's team to attend future FORC meetings and requested that the FORC be put on main stakeholder list. British Waterways Joe Young- Towpath Ranger Felicity McClintock- Volunteer Co-ordinator 1 JY is BW's first towpath ranger. He patrols London's towpaths and runs campaigns and events. 2 FM is the newly appointed volunteer coordinator and is looking to get a volunteer ranger scheme up and running. 3 DB stated that there is conflict between pedestrians and cyclists throughout the country. 4 BW are working with TFL regarding alternative cycle routes and that measure are being put in place to slow down cyclists, e.g. chicanes. JY to find out 5 HD added that proposals for alternative cycle routes were mapped out years ago and asked if BW's current work to explore alternative routes is based on the Atkins study that was carried out a while ago. 6 DB mentioned that TFL provide funding to boroughs to develop infrastructure. 7 HP added that the high volume of cyclists is a problem rather than cyclist on the towpaths per se. 8 The chicane by Danbury St has proven to be successful in slowing down cyclists. 9 HP added that chicanes don't always work and that BW should consider closing off narrow stretches to cyclists. 10 EW added that walking along the towpath can be a scary experience because of speeding cyclists. 11 CA added that banning cycling would be unenforceable. Those who cycle too fast or dangerously should be encouraged to change their behaviour. 12 Some cyclists don't ring their bells and are inconsiderate. 13 Thames 21 run regular clean up campaigns. 14 There are 17 bins along the Islington stretch of the canal which are being emptied twice a day - a partnership between LBI and BW. 15 A contract is in place to maintain the grass verges. 16 Minimum safety standards audit carried out. ST asked members to contact him directly with any issues, such as dumped bikes and rubbish. 17 It was pointed out that information about the theatre production along the canal contained inaccurate information. 18 BD handed out proposal (2 options) for the Danbury Street ramp and asked FORC members to complete the questionnaire survey. Proposal won't encroach on the water space. 19 Design solutions improve the ramp surface and the ramp gradient. 20 HP asked if proposals link in with the Atkins study. 4. Any other business None Date of next meeting: TBC For more information please contact Sandra Hoisz (Friends of Regent's Canal Secretary) via Groundwork on 020 7239 1389 or e-mail Sandra.Hoisz@groundwork.org.uk

Friends of Regent's Canal (FoRC), Islington Wednesday 4th November 2009 Islington Canal Museum, Wharf Rd, N1 Chair- Lisa Tang Present: Lisa Tang (LT) Chair (Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners) Bupesh Thapa LBI Greenspace Fiona McLean LNBC Eric Sorensen Angel Association Chris Ashby ICAG Leo Chapman Regent's Network Del Brenner Regent's Network & London Waterways Commission Joe Young BW Gordon Meen Reachview Ct Resident Henrietta Ross 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Minutes of last meeting and matters arisingLocations of further moorings should be carefully chosen & moorings assessed on their merits No update from Seema Manchanda BW re-structure comes into effect in November 3. Noel Road Entrance 3.1 DB wrote to BW, he received a reply which stated that small alterations, such as levelling out or putting in a chicane would be considered 3.2 LT suggested that ES takes pictures so that FORC can comment 3.3 DB to forward e-mail to LT. 3.4 CA commented that surface could be made smoother. 3.5 Gate locking: LT received an e-mail from AB; John Martin (boat warden) is concerned about the section where canal boats are nearest the Islington tunnel; this section used to be locked at night, but isn't any more. Residents are experiencing asb. 3.6 BT made reference to the opposite side, Vincent Terrace, and fed back that rough sleepers have been observed. SNT responded and recommended that parts where boats are should be locked. However, those who are up to no good might climb over the fence, while others would be locked out. 4. London Waterways Commission- presentation on freight. Summary by DB Is there potential for freight or will the canal become a theme park?DB provided brief history of London's canals and waterways, as well as a hand out of key waterways. There is huge potential- waste could be taken to the waste recycling site by water. Packington and King's Place developments used the canal for freight. There is a potential conflict between users - barges, residential boats, river taxis, etc. However, there should be room for everyone. Freight could create employment opportunities, new skippers, deck hands, etc. A new career structure could be created. There are currently very limited training opportunities. Feedback from the TFL presentation was that freight is not possible on the Regent's Canal due to moored boats. Kim Mills who is employed by TFL & BW gave a presentation to LWC. He recommended water taxis from Paddington to Camden. FM flagged up that commuting would only be feasible on certain routes due to limited speed. 5. Networking Event 5.1 DB suggested that it should include a debate; BW user groups could give a presentation followed by questions. 5.2 LT fed back that BW are supportive and would like meaningful outcomes. The event is an opportunity for groups and individuals to come together. Possible venues are the canal museum (might be a bit too small?) or King's Place or could link in with Argent's showcase at the German Gym. Format of the event could be a social/ networking event with a few presentations, debate and guest speakers. 5.3 Forward suggestions to SH 6. AOB6.1 Tiber Gardens consultation- majority in favour of opening it up; budget of £150k to be spent by March 2010 Date of next meeting: TBC For more information please contact Sandra Hoisz (Friends of Regent's Canal Secretary) via Groundwork on 020 7239 1389 or e-mail Sandra.Hoisz@groundwork.org.uk

Friends of Regents Canal (FoRC), Islington Wednesday 29th September 2010 Islington Canal Museum, Wharf Rd, N1 Chair- Chris Ashby Present: Chris Ashby Chair, ICAG Sandra Hoisz FoRC Secretary, Groundwork Bupesh Thapa LBI Greenspace Fiona McLean LNBC Eric Sorensen Angel Association Chris Ashby ICAG Del Brenner Regent's Network & London Waterways Commission Gordon Meen Reachview Ct Resident Beverly Dean Angel Association Richard Rutter British Waterways Jon Guest British Waterways Ian Shacklock Islington Boat Club, ICAG Rob Inglis Angela Inglis Gillian Comins Apologies: Lisa Tang Leo Chapman Beryl Windsor Joseph Young 1. Welcome and Introductions CA kindly agreed to chair the meeting in the absence of Lisa Tang, who is sick. Everyone was happy for CA to chair the meeting. 2. Minutes of last meeting and matters arising Minutes were agreed. 3. Danbury Street Ramp RR and JG from BW responded to concerns raised about the ramp and the entrance feature. 3.1. BD said that members of the Angel Assoc. are considering putting in a freedom of information request to find out the total cost of the scheme, including the closure of the road and consultation carried out. She added that the workmanship is poor, it was barely finished for the Canal Festival, the steps are not draining properly and that it doesn't look finished. She felt it's a missed opportunity. 3.2 RR agreed with many of the points raised and offered an apology on behalf of BW. Works stemmed from a hazard assessment carried out by TFL in 2007/08. The Danbury Street Ramp is the most well used ramp on the Regent's Canal and something needed to be done to address the conflict between cyclists and pedestrians, including slowing down cyclists and segregating cyclists and pedestrians. Observations suggest that 70-75% of pedestrians now walk up the steps. 3.3. RR conceded that the contractor got lots of things wrong and that there are lots of issues to be resolved. Most issues should be resolved by the end of October 2010. Action: RR to forward snagging list 3.4 The contractor only realised that the original method statement wasn't possible when they started on site, which led to delays. The contractor used inappropriate machinery, which caused too much vibration. Further, third party wall issues were time consuming to resolve. Due to delays the contractor lost the road closure period and had to reapply. Only part of the road was closed off, which meant that the method statement had to be altered yet again. 3.5 The anticipated budget was £178k, spend to date is £219k, with an additional £54k still in dispute. 3.6 The arch was developed with input from Hanover school and cost £11.5k. It went up without design approval from BW. It is too big, in the wrong location and impeded the steps. It is currently in storage in Enfield until a new, more suitable location can be found. 3.7 DB asked if trees would be replaced, as agreed with Islington Council. RR confirmed that 2 trees will be planted. DB asked if they will be mature or semi matures trees. JG agreed to check. Action: JG to check 3.8 RR informed the group that more 2 Tings events will take place and a speed calming measure at the bottom of the ramp installed. The speed bump will be DDA compliant. 3.9 FM enquired why cyclists are no longer asked to dismount under bridges. JG told her that is unenforceable and that 2 Ting events are an effective means of engaging cyclists in particular. 3.10 GC felt that local residents were not consulted about works. 3.11 RR said that local residents were e-mailed, received a letter and questionnaire surveys were carried out. DB felt that a one day event does not constitute consultation. BD added that she was not aware of works until contractors started on site. DB had requested a copy of the revised design, but didn't receive a copy. RR suggested that the FORC suggest a protocol for finding out about works on the towpath. BB submit planning applications when required to do so. RR suggested that a protocol for consultation when no planning permission is required would be helpful. 3.12 The next BW user group meeting will take place on 19 October 2010 7pm at the Canal Museum. 3.13 FM asked about the proposed new structure of BW RR informed the group that BW will be run as a Trust and would have a SLA with the government for a minimum of 10-15 years. There would be opportunities for groups to get more involved and for communities to adopt stretches of canal. It is envisaged that a new structure will be in place by spring 2012. 4. Canal the Musical- Rob Inglis 4.1 RI & AI would like to revive Canal- the musical, which was successfully performed in 2008. RI is currently fundraising. 4.2 CA proposed that FORC endorse it- all agreed. 5. AOB 5.1 CA read out an e-mail received from Beryl Windsor about the Canal Festival. Many congratulations to Beryl for organising the best canal festival in London. 5.2 Election of new FORC chair- no nominations were received. The future of the group was discussed. All agreed that the group should continue to meet. IS agreed to chair the next meeting in late November/ early December. Action: IS to chair next mtg. BT suggested new members could be recruited and the group expanded to encompass Hackney and Camden. In light of funding cuts BT was unable to confirm continuation funding for admin support. ES added that the group is useful way of group/ individuals to engage with BW. GM suggested that the King's Cross development could be a focus for the group over the next few years SH to put up posters along the canal to advertise the next meeting to towpath users. Action: SH to put up posters Suggestions for the next meeting included Inviting Arts Officers from Camden and Islington The future of the group An update from Argent 5.3 DB felt that there is little information available about the £1.5 million canal fund, and that there seems to be little focus of how it will be spent. There is no information who is controlling the fund. EC added that it's "virtual money" based on future development. An update from Argent would be useful. 5.4 City Rd Basin- BT informed the group that the gate should be open. 5.5 Development of top of City Rd (259)- ES informed the group that affordable housing was built first and that the tower will be added later 5.6 DB raised the issue of shared paths- shared paths are not wide enough to accommodate cyclists and pedestrians as per Sustrans recommendations and that alternative routes should be promoted. GM added that cycle maps are available and that 2 Tings events are being held. Date of next meeting: TBC For more information please contact Sandra Hoisz (Friends of Regent's Canal Secretary) via Groundwork on 020 7239 1389 or e-mail Sandra.Hoisz@groundwork.org.uk

Friends of Regents Canal (FoRC), Islington Wednesday 1st December 2010 Islington Canal Museum, Wharf Rd, N1 Chair- Ian Shacklock Present: Ian Shacklock Islington Boat Club Sandra Hoisz FoRC Secretary, Groundwork Bupesh Thapa LBI Greenspace Chris Ashby Islington Cyclist Action Group (ICAG) Del Brenner Regent's Network & London Waterways Commission Gordon Meen Reachview Ct Resident Rob Inglis Dilwar Hussain Resident Jo Moore City Road Basin Resident Peter Moore City Road Basin Resident Simon Williams Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners Beryl Windsor (BWi) Angel Canal Festival, St. Pancras Cruising Club Lisa Tang Thornhill Bridge Community Gardeners Anna Strongman Argent Apologies: Cllr Convery Angela Inglis 1. Welcome and Introductions IS kindly agreed to chair the meeting, all agreed. 2. Minutes of last meeting and matters arising Minutes were agreed. Matters arising: 3.7 Update from John Guest (Waterways Manager, British Waterways) required. Action: SH to contact JG for an update 4. RI offered to invite Arts Officers to future meeting & copy in IS. Action: RI to contact Arts Officers Anna Strongman informed the group that the canal master plan is available. The next step is to decide about which projects will be taken forward, and when. Action: AS to forward master plan to SH. SH to disseminate. DB enquired about the total amount of the fund. AS responded that the fund is made up of a lump sum and top up from rents of retail units. S106 information is on Camden Council's website. A committee consisting of King's Cross Central and BW will decide how fund is used. Not all recommendations are deliverable within the fund. DB asked if spending of the fund will be open and accountable. AS responded that Argent's expertise lies in managing construction projects and that some funding has been spent on the canal. GM updated the group about Camden's Wildlife Forum, which he attended. He informed the group of Camden's Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) and that Richard Harris is happy in principal to attend a future FORC meeting to talk about biodiversity. Leanne Brisland is Islington's biodiversity officer and could also be invited to a future meeting. CA added that it is timely to get an update on biodiversity. Action: IS to invite biodiversity officers to a future meeting DB mentioned that the towpath isn't always wide enough for cyclists and that the towpath shouldn't be a designated cycle route. Recreational cycling is tolerable. GM added that maps of alternative routes are available. 3. King's Cross Central Scheme: Update from Anna Strongman, Argent 3.1 The scheme runs between stations up to Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) line and York Way, and will be mixed use, including offices, new homes, retail, education and leisure uses. The south focuses on office development and shops at street level. The north is lower density and includes educational and cultural facilities, such a new University of the Arts building. The Great Northern Hotel is due to reopen in 2012. There will also be a new ticket hall for King's Cross (to be completed in 2012). Argent are in discussion with Camden Council about relocating the town hall, which will include a leisure centre. The university building is due to open in Sept 2011. There will be a block of social housing in the north, opp. the training centre on York Way. Receipts are ploughed back into the infrastructure of the area- improvement to the street scene and public spaces, including squares, boulevards, Goods Way, the bridge, Cubitt Street, Canal Street, etc. (provided deals can be struck and cash raised). 3.2 There are 120 construction apprentices, as well as a post construction job brokerage. Community development projects include skip and hoop gardens- mobile food growing areas- which can be moved when sites where they are currently located will be developed. 3.3 The bridge is complete, it needs to be joined up with the boulevard and street and will open in September 2011. LT asked what steps are being taken to enhance biodiversity and was concerned that much of the landscaping, for example by the access ramp to the canal, is hard landscaping. Maybe nesting rafts or planting could be added. 3.4 AS responded that the level change and access necessitated hard landscaping in this area. However, where possible soft landscaping is being included. A new play area has been designed as a natural play space, including soft landscaping. Further, hoop and skip gardens have been created. CA added that gardens are great and would like to know when they would be moved and where to. AS expanded that Global Generation developed gardens. They work in the wider area and have set up the gardens to link to youth development and enterprise projects. The hoop garden was added so that more produce can be grown which is sold to local restaurants. Possible date for relocation is Nov 2011; a site has not yet been identified. 3.5 RI mentioned that there is space for events north of the canal for events in 2012. AS added that areas might be GLA live sites- Olympics would be shown on large screens. This depends on sponsors. 3.6 2012 is the anniversary of the canal- could this been incorporated into celebrations? AS informed the group that a curator- Michael Pinsky- has been appointed who is developing a vision for the site and Arts programme, inc. temporary installations and exhibitions. LT asked if he could be reminded of the canal and consider it in the development of his framework. CA added that Florence Salberter at BW is a useful contact. DB said that the Olympics are a good opportunity to run activities that benefit people and to develop projects with a legacy. AS said that Argent is supportive as long as activities don't impede developments and that sponsors can be identified. Action: AS to put FORC in touch with curator (via IS) 3.7 RI suggested that projects with a historical perspective are considered in addition to sports coverage during the Olympics. FORC would like to be put in touch with the curator to develop a link and ensure that the canal doesn't get forgotten about and is considered as a location for events/ exhibitions/ activities. 3.8 SW suggested that interesting tree species are considered, including sculptural trees. DB suggested that the curator could work with landscapers to make the landscape more interesting. AS responded that Argent are working with landscape architects. 3.9 CA said that it would be helpful to be provided with an update from Argent every 6 months. 4. Danbury Street Ramp- Snag List 4.1 BWi said that most of it seems to have been done. There is a new surface on the slope/steps. She added that the new ramp is a big improvement, she told the group that a wheelchair user slipped off the old ramp, which couldn't happen now. She is grateful that the ramp is now safe to use. Action: SH to contact BW for update Update from BW would be helpful. DB suggested that lessons learnt should be drawn out to avoid mistakes being repeated. Action: SH to forward snag list to Angel Assoc. 5. Future of the group 5.1 BT informed the group that due to funding constraints funding for Groundwork for the administration of the group has been cut. This is SH's last FORC meeting. Group thanked SH for secretarial services. LT nominated IS as the new chair, all agreed. 5.2 It was agreed that the future of the group will be discussed at a future meeting, including the formalisation of FORC as a constituted group, FORC role in light of changes at BW, etc. 6. AOB 6.1 DB fed back from the London Waterways Commission that there is discussion about the mayor of London taking over the management of canals in London. There is £18k- £22k from the London Canal Committee which hasn't been spent on canals. . 6.2 RI talked about reviving Canal the Musical in 2012. FORC happy to provide letter of support (all agreed). Letter could also be sent to the curator. Action: IS to liaise with RI